Beta This is a new service and it is still being tested. Tell us about a problem.

Parliament's record since 1997: debates, questions, statements, votes, bills, committees and members' interests

Where MPs Stand

Sourced briefings on the record of Parliament

Methodology

How Where MPs Stand answers a question, where its information comes from, how it checks itself, and how it stays neutral.

What it does, and what it does not

Hansard is the official, word-for-word record of Parliament. Parliament's own Hansard search is the right tool for finding something you know is there: a phrase, a debate, or everything one member said on a day. It is fast, complete and authoritative, and every source shown here links back to the official record.

Where MPs Stand answers questions instead. Ask, in plain English, what has been said on a subject and by whom, and it writes a short briefing on the positions taken, grouped by who holds them, with every point linked to the speech it came from.

What is covered

The record runs from the general election of 1 May 1997 to the present, and is updated twice a day. Some parts start later: the Lords in November 1999, Westminster Hall in 2000, written questions in 2001, written statements in 2002 and Public Bill Committees (then Standing Committees) in 2001. Early day motions, Commons votes and election results (general and by-elections) start in 1997. The status page shows the most recent record and the last update.

How a question is answered

  1. The question becomes filters you can see and change. A language model turns the question into search terms and filters: dates, House, regions, parties, named members, roles (such as government ministers) and the policy areas involved. "Northern MPs" means MPs for seats in the North East, North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber. The filters are shown with every briefing and can be edited and re-run.
  2. The record is searched by words and by meaning. Keyword search finds the exact terms; meaning-based search finds speeches that make the same point in different words. Results are ranked by relevance, by how recent they are, and by whether the speaker held a relevant office at the time, such as the minister for the department concerned (or, with less weight, a seat on a select committee on the subject). The weight given to recency and to office can be changed in Settings. A contribution mainly about one place, such as a town's bus route or a constituency's station, counts for a little less when the question is about a national subject, so national points lead; it counts in full when the question names a place, a region, a kind of seat or a member. The same filters and settings always return the same sources.
  3. Evidence is chosen for balance, not just for matches. The sources passed on are spread across speaker groups, such as government, opposition and backbenches, with no more than two contributions from any one speaker. Members who raised the subject on three or more separate days among the records found (not counting what they said as ministers) are included first, up to four of them, so that a backbencher who keeps returning to a subject is not crowded out by members who mentioned it once; the briefing may say that they raised it repeatedly. It gives no number of days, since that depends on which records a search finds. A summary computed from the data, not written by the model, shows how many contributions came from which groups, parties and kinds of seat, and who raised the subject most often.
  4. The rest of the record takes the room its relevance earns. Early day motions, the Scottish Parliament, the Senedd, the Northern Ireland Assembly and witnesses' evidence to committees are searched alongside. Everything found is compared in meaning with the question by the same local model, so all of it is on one scale: a weak match is left out, and the closest take up to ten places (fifteen in a comprehensive briefing) beside the Westminster sources, with no more than three from any one devolved debate. Anything closer to the question than the weakest Westminster source can then take its place, up to half of them, though never the only source from a party or from a member who keeps raising the subject. So a subject argued mainly in Holyrood or in committee brings in more of that record, and the number of sources stays the same.
  5. The briefing is written only from those sources. The briefing is written by an AI model (Claude, made by Anthropic). It receives only the sources found, is instructed to use no other knowledge, and must attach a citation to every statement about what anyone said. It connects the sources where they meet (a concern raised in the Commons and put to witnesses, a policy decided differently in Holyrood), but always names a devolved parliament, and presents a witness's words as evidence to a committee, never as the view of Parliament.
  6. The briefing is then checked automatically. Every passage behind a citation is checked against the original text, and any citation that does not match is removed. Every quotation the briefing puts in quotation marks is also checked, word for word, against the speech it is attributed to; one that cannot be found is marked. Statements without a source are counted under the briefing, and can be shown. Judgemental words used in the briefing's own voice are underlined. Spelling is set to British English, never inside quotations.
  7. When the record has nothing, it says so. If no sufficiently relevant records are found, the answer is "No records found", and no briefing is written.

The Where they stand table at the top of a briefing is taken from the briefing's own section headings ("Ministers: setting out measures"), with the number of sources each section cites; it adds no judgement of its own, so it always matches the text below it. On a member's page, Speaks most about counts the debate titles and question topics they spoke or asked about on the most separate days in their last two years in Parliament, leaving out routine business such as Prime Minister's engagements. No AI is used for it.

Who said it, as they were at the time

Every contribution is matched to a person by a unique identifier, never by name, so a member is recognised across changes of name and title (for example, an MP who later sits in the Lords). Each speaker is described as they were on the day they spoke: their party, their constituency and its region or nation, and any government, opposition or select committee chair role they held on that date. A minister is labelled a minister only for what they said while in office.

City, town and rural seats

Seat types are defined by the size of the built-up area that people live in, not by whether a place has official city status. Some small places are cities, and some large ones are towns, so official status says little about what a constituency is like.

The calculation uses official data from each nation: the Office for National Statistics' built-up areas and Census 2011 populations for England and Wales, National Records of Scotland settlements and Census 2022 for Scotland, and the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency's settlement classification and Census 2021 for Northern Ireland. A large conurbation is not allowed to swallow neighbouring counties, so commuter towns around London, such as Watford and St Albans, count as towns.

Age and gender

A question can ask how women and men, or older and younger members, have differed on an issue, or can be limited to one group ("what have female MPs said about childcare?"). Briefings mention gender or age only when the question asks about them, and never generalise beyond the speeches cited.

Majorities and first-term MPs

Each MP's source shows their majority at the time they spoke, from the most recent election in their seat before that day (a general election or a by-election), and, for current MPs, their majority now. Questions can be limited to, or compare, MPs in marginal and safe seats, or newly elected MPs and those re-elected at least once.

What each vote was on

A division's title usually names only the bill or the debate, so a vote can look like a vote on a whole policy when it was on an amendment, a single clause, the timetable, or a motion to decline the bill. Each division is therefore labelled with the kind of vote it was, read from the record itself: the question put just before the division (for example “That the Bill be now read a Second time”) and the outcome recorded just after it.

Devolved subjects

Many subjects debated at Westminster, such as health, schools and housing, are decided separately in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. When a question is about one of them, a short note beside the briefing says which nations Westminster decides it for, so that a debate about the NHS in England is not read as covering the whole UK. Members for seats in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland may still speak on these subjects, about their own nation or about UK-wide funding.

Donations

MP pages and the donations page show political donations from the Electoral Commission's register, which lists donations above the reporting limits since 2001. The Commission names each recipient but gives no Parliament ID, so donations are matched to MPs by name and date:

Contains Electoral Commission Information © Electoral Commission and/or database right. Around 99% of donations recorded as given to an MP are linked; the rest were mostly made before the person was elected or after they left. Donations to central parties are not linked to anyone. Every entry links to the Commission's own record. A donation is not a finding of wrongdoing, and does not show that it influenced anything a member said or did.

Company roles

MP and peer pages, and the company roles page, show the companies where a member is (or was) a director, company secretary or member of a partnership, from the Companies House register, through its free public data service. Companies House does not link its records to Parliament, so each member is looked up by name, and a Companies House record is used only when all of these agree with what is known about the member:

Members whose birth month is not known are not looked up, and peers known by a title unlike their surname may be missed. Two people can share a name and a month of birth, so a match can occasionally be wrong: every entry links to the Companies House record, a wrong match can be reported and is then removed, and a company also named in the member's register of interests is marked as such. Addresses and nationality are not shown. Companies House records no resignation when a company is dissolved, so a role in a dissolved company is shown as ended ("until the company closed"), not as current. Members are checked a few hundred at a time at each update and again about every four weeks. Holding a company role is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Registered interests in briefings

When a briefing quotes an MP or a peer, their entries in the Register of Members' Financial Interests or the Register of Lords' Interests, and donations to them in the Electoral Commission's register of donations, are checked against what they said. Only entries that applied on the day count: ongoing interests (jobs, directorships, shareholdings, land, unpaid roles) registered on or before it and not ended by then, and one-off ones (gifts, hospitality, visits, donations, single payments) registered in the twelve months before it (donations: accepted in those twelve months). An AI model (Claude Haiku) then judges, strictly, which of those concern the same organisation, industry, profession or subject as the contribution, and describes the link in one neutral sentence. Broad ties do not count: membership of a professional or learned body, a member's own profession on its own, or a donation from a private individual or an unrelated business. Posts in government, Parliament or a party (a minister's salary, a whip's role) are the member's public job, not an outside interest, and are never flagged. A matched source's citation numbers are shown in amber, its card is marked, a note under the briefing lists who was flagged, and the source panel opens on the entries.

A match is a connection to check, not a finding: members register interests so that they can be seen, and having one is not wrongdoing. The model can miss a relevant entry or link one that is not. For MPs, every edition of the Commons register since November 2000 is kept, so an MP's entries are those on the register at the time they spoke (registered by then and still listed then), including interests that have since ended. The Lords register is current only, so for peers' older contributions an interest that has since ended may not be seen. Where a member declared an interest when speaking, the source shows that too, in their own words.

All-party groups

The all-party groups pages, and the groups on MP and peer pages, come from the Register of All-Party Parliamentary Groups and the devolved parliaments' lists of cross-party groups, via mySociety's APPG dataset (CC BY 4.0), refreshed weekly. Parliament's own register site turns away automated downloads, so the site uses mySociety's copy.

Contact addresses and email addresses in the register are left out.

Neutrality

Where MPs Stand takes no position on any issue, party or person. Briefings report what was said and by whom; they do not judge whether it was right.

What the warnings mean

Statements not tied to a source
Statements in the briefing that no cited source directly supports. Their number is given under the briefing; choose “Show them” to mark them. Treat them with caution.
Underlined word
A judgemental word in the briefing's own voice rather than in a quotation. Check the sources.
Shaded quotation
Words in quotation marks that were not found, word for word, in the source cited for them. Check the source before relying on them.
"No records found"
The record, with the filters shown, contains nothing sufficiently relevant. No briefing was written.

Saved and shared briefings

Every briefing is saved at its own address, such as wherempsstand.com/b/k3m7q2xwpa, so it can be shared and cited. A saved briefing shows exactly what was shown when it was written, with its sources and checks, the date it was prepared and the most recent record it could draw on. Saved briefings are not listed anywhere on the site, and search engines are asked not to index them.

The record keeps changing, so a saved briefing can fall out of date; "Ask again" writes a new one from the current record. A briefing that is found to be wrong or unfair can be withdrawn; its address then says so. Questions are saved with their briefings, so please do not include personal details in a question.

Limitations

Data sources and licences